Quran, Culture And Civilization

Quran, Culture And Civilization

The Discursive Antagonism in Sūrat al-Aḥzāb: A Study Based on Selected Components of Laclau and Mouffe’s Theory

Author
Sayyed Jafar Sadeghi
Assistant Professor, Department of Theology Education, Farhangiyān University, Tehran, Iran
10.22034/jksl.2025.493335.1418
Abstract
Sūrat al-Aḥzāb addresses challenging themes related to the personal life of the Prophet (PBUH), which have led to various judgments about him and have been exploited by critics of Islam. Additionally, some detractors consider the Qur’an to be incoherent and disjointed, citing the apparent diversity and fragmentation of topics in this sūrah as evidence. Despite several studies on Sūrat al-Aḥzāb, it has not yet been examined through the lens of discourse analysis—a modern linguistic approach to textual analysis. This study hypothesizes that the sūrah’s numerous socio-political statements revolve around a single discursive core. Drawing on select components of Laclau and Mouffe’s theory—which expands discourse from philosophy and culture into the realms of society and politics—this research aims to explain the nature of discursive antagonism in Sūrat al-Aḥzāb. Findings show that two opposing discourses were at play during the revelation of this sūrah. The hypocrites and the weak-hearted constructed a discourse of ignorance and opposition, centered on the notion of hereditary prophethood and support for the Prophet’s adopted son as his successor. This discourse was reinforced by several associated nodal points. In response, the discourse of faith—backed by God, the Prophet (PBUH), and sincere believers—defended the Prophet’s divine mission and role as the Seal of the Prophets, denying any hereditary or elective succession. In doing so, it preserved its hegemonic position and advanced this claim as its central nodal point.

Graphical Abstract

The Discursive Antagonism in Sūrat al-Aḥzāb: A Study Based on Selected Components of Laclau and Mouffe’s Theory
Keywords
Qur’an
Sūrat al-Aḥzāb
Discourse Analysis
Laclau and Mouffe
Nodal Point

Subjects

The Qurʾān. [In Arabic]
ʿAkāshah, M. (2005). al-Taḥlīl al-Lughawī fī Ḍawʾ ʿIlm al-Dalālah. University Publishing. [In Arabic]
Armin, M. (2021). “Interpretation of Q 33:37 Based on a Critical Review of Historical Reports.” Qur’an Interpretation and Language Studies, 9(2), 175–199. https://doi.org/10.30473/quran.2021.8205 [In Persian]
Darwazah, M. ʿ. (2000). al-Tafsīr al-Ḥadīth. Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī. [In Arabic]
Dehghānī Fīrūābādī, S. J., & ʿAṭāʾī, M. (2014). “The Core Discourse of Iran's Eleventh Administration.” Strategic Studies, 17(1), 87–120. [In Persian]
Farrāʾ, Y. b. Z. (1980). Maʿānī al-Qurʾān. Egyptian General Book Organization. [In Arabic]
Goldziher, I. (1995). Madhāhib al-Tafsīr al-Islāmī. Maktabat al-Khānjī. [In Arabic]
Giladi, A. (2002). “Family of the Prophet.” Encyclopedia of the Qurʾān, vol. 2. Brill.
Görke, A. (2023). “The Story of Muhammad and Zaynab bint Jaḥsh in Historical and Exegetical Sources: Origins and Developments.” Sirah Studies of the Ahl al-Bayt, 9(16), 5–34. [In Persian]
Ḥasanī Ḥusaynābādī, Ḥ., et al. (2021). “Phonosemantic Analysis of Sūrat al-Aḥzāb.” Meshkāt, 40(1), 4–25. [In Persian]
Ḥokmābādī, Ḥ.-A., Raʾīsīyān, G., & Esmāʿīlīzādeh, ʿA. (2019). “A Reasoned Discovery of the Structure and Purpose of Sūrat al-Aḥzāb.” Ketāb-e Qayyim, 9(21), 7–38. [In Persian]
Hotz, S. (2002). Mohammed und seine Lehre. Peter Lang. [In German]
Ḥusaynīzādeh, M.-ʿA. (2004). “Discourse Theory and Political Analysis.” Political Sciences Quarterly, 7(28), 99–120. [In Persian]
Ibn ʿAbd al-Barr, Y. b. ʿA. (1991). al-Istīʿāb. Dār al-Jīl. [In Arabic]
Ibn ʿĀshūr, M. Ṭ. (1999). al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr. Muʾassasat al-Tārīkh al-ʿArabī. [In Arabic]
Ibn Abī Ḥātim, ʿA. b. M. (1999). Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-ʿAẓīm. Maktabat Nizār Muṣṭafā al-Bāz. [In Arabic]
Ibn Hishām, ʿA. al-M. (n.d.). al-Sīrah al-Nabawiyyah. Dār al-Maʿrifah. [In Arabic]
Ibn Manẓūr, M. b. M. (1993). Lisān al-ʿArab. Dār Ṣādir. [In Arabic]
Ibn Saʿd, M. (n.d.). al-Ṭabaqāt al-Kubrā. Dār Ṣādir. [In Arabic]
Kasarāyī, M.-S., & Pūzesh Shīrāzī, ʿA. (2009). “Laclau and Mouffe's Discourse Theory as a Tool in Understanding Political Phenomena.” Politics Quarterly, 39(3), 339–360. [In Persian]
Khaṭīb, ʿA.-K. (2003). al-Tafsīr al-Qurʾānī li-l-Qurʾān. Dār al-Fikr al-ʿArabī. [In Arabic]
Jørgensen, M., & Phillips, L. (2008). Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method (trans. Hādī Jalīlī). Nashr-e Ney. [In Persian]
Laclau, E. (1994). The Making of Political Identities. Verso.
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1990). New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time. Verso.
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1990). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Verso.
Makāram Shīrāzī, N. (1992). Tafsīr-i Namūneh. Tehran: Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmiyyah. [In Persian]
Marsh, D., & Stoker, G. (1999). Theory and Methods in Political Science (trans. Amīr Moḥammad Ḥājī-Yūsefī). Strategic Research Institute. [In Persian]
Moqqaddamī, M.-T. (2011). “Laclau and Mouffe’s Discourse Theory and Its Critique.” Cultural and Social Knowledge Journal, 2(3), 91–124. [In Persian]
Muqātil b. Sulaymān (2002). al-Tafsīr. Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī. [In Arabic]
Naṣīrīān, Y. (1994). “A Study on the Adoption of Zayd b. Ḥārithah.” Articles and Reviews, 0(57–58), 51–69. [In Persian]
Qāḍī ʿIyāḍ, I. M. (1984). al-Shifāʾ bi-Taʿrīf Ḥuqūq al-Muṣṭafā (ed. Muḥammad al-Bughāwī). Dār al-Kitāb al-ʿArabī. [In Arabic]
Qurashī, ʿA. A. (1996). Tafsīr-i Aḥsan al-Ḥadīth. Baʿthat Foundation. [In Persian]
Salmanzādeh, J., & Nūrāʾī, M. (2023). “Using the First Context to Discover the Purpose of the Sūrah: A Case Study of Sūrat al-Aḥzāb.” Tafsīrpazhūhī, 10(19), 315–337. https://doi.org/10.22049/quran.2023.14614 [In Persian]
Ṣāber Mūlāʾī, M., Dīyārī Bīdgolī, M.-T., & Shāhroudī, M.-R. (2023). “A Historical Explanation of the Social Role of the Prophet’s Wives.” Historical Studies in Quran and Hadith, 29(74), 157–181. [In Persian]
Ṣādiqī Tehrānī, M. (1986). al-Furqān fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān bi-l-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah. Farhang-e Islāmī. [In Arabic]
Suyūṭī, ʿA. b. A. B. (1984). al-Durr al-Manthūr fī al-Tafsīr bi-l-Maʾthūr. Marʿashī Najafī Library. [In Arabic]
Suyūṭī, ʿA. b. A. B. (2001). al-Itqān fī ʿUlūm al-Qurʾān. Dār al-Kitāb al-ʿArabī. [In Arabic]
Ṭabāṭabāʾī, S. M. Ḥ. (1970). al-Mīzān fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān. Muʾassasat al-Aʿlamī. [In Arabic]
Ṭabarī, M. b. J. (1992). Jāmiʿ al-Bayān fī Tafsīr Āy al-Qurʾān. Dār al-Maʿrifah. [In Arabic]
Ṭabarsī, F. b. Ḥ. (1993). Majmaʿ al-Bayān fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān. Muʾassasat al-Aʿlamī. [In Arabic]
Ṭūsī, M. b. al-Ḥ. (n.d.). al-Tibyān fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān. Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī. [In Arabic]
Zamakhsharī, M. b. ʿU. (1987). al-Kashshāf  (ed. Muṣṭafā Ḥusayn Aḥmad). Dār al-Kitāb al-ʿArabī. [In Arabic]

  • Receive Date 10 December 2024
  • Revise Date 11 January 2025
  • Accept Date 13 January 2025
  • Publish Date 22 May 2025